What makes these groups different then biblical Christianity?



Seventh-day Adventists

Other Groups

Legal-JW Child Custody

Home Page



On the topic of

Jehovah's Witnesses


See DVD catalog for

prices & more details.



JW's and the Real Jesus


JW's a Non-prophet Organization


Witnesses of Jehovah


The Witness at

Your Door

The Witness Goes Out

Battling over

the Children

(JW Child custody cases)

DVD catalog


From: The Associated Press

Religion Today



The Associated Press

Thursday, January 26, 2006; 12:00 PM


NEW YORK -- Jehovah's Witnesses are renowned for teaching that Jesus is not God and that the world as we know it will soon end. But another unusual belief causes even more entanglements _ namely, that God forbids blood transfusions even when patients' lives are at stake.

The doctrine's importance will be underscored next week as elders who lead more than 98,000 congregations worldwide recite a new five-page blood directive from headquarters.

The tightly disciplined sect believes the Bible forbids transfusions, though specifics have gradually been eased over the years. Raymond Franz, a defector from the all-powerful Governing Body that sets policies for the faith, thinks leaders hesitate to go further for fear that total elimination of the ban would expose the organization to millions of dollars in legal liability over past medical cases.

The Witnesses have opposed transfusions of whole blood since 1945. A later pronouncement also barred transfusions of blood's "primary components," meaning red cells, white cells, platelets and plasma.

An announcement in 2000 in the official Watchtower magazine, however, said that because of ambiguity in the Bible, individuals are free to decide about therapies using the biological compounds that make up those four blood components, such as gamma globulin and clotting factors that counteract hemophilia.

Next week's directive could create confusion about these compounds, known as blood "fractions."

Without noting the 2000 change, the new directive tells parents to consider this: "Can any doctor or hospital give complete assurance that blood or blood fractions will not be used in treatment of a minor?"

Aside from the new directive, a footnote in the Witnesses' standard brochure, "How Can Blood Save Your Life?," mentions the 2000 article on fractions _ but then omits its contents.

By coincidence, next week's directive follows some heavy criticism of the blood transfusion policy from attorney Kerry Louderback-Wood of Fort Myers, Fla., writing in the Journal of Church and State, published by Baylor University.

Louderback-Wood, who was raised a Witness but now has no religious affiliation, accuses her former faith of giving "inaccurate and possibly dishonest arguments" to believers facing crucial medical decisions.

Louderback-Wood complains that many Witnesses and physicians aren't given clear instruction about their faith's blood transfusion policy, particularly on the subject of fractions.

She's no disinterested bystander. The lawyer says her mother died from severe anemia in 2004 because local elders didn't realize hemoglobin is permitted.

Louderback-wood learned that hemoglobin was allowed from the Web site of Associated Jehovah's Witnesses for Reform on Blood, which was founded in 1997 by dissenting local elders, eight of whom served on Hospital Liaison Committees that advise Witnesses and physicians.

The founder of Associated Jehovah's Witnesses, speaking on condition of anonymity to protect his standing in a faith that does not tolerate dissent, says liaison committee members know about the revised teachings, but most Witnesses automatically refuse all forms of blood without consulting the committees. Physicians are often ill-informed about Witness beliefs, he says.

Louderback-Wood thinks the faith is subject to legal liability for misinforming adherents, which to her knowledge is an untested theory in U.S. courts. Related issues arise in a pending lawsuit in Calgary, Alberta, however, over the alleged "wrongful death" of teenage leukemia patient Bethany Hughes.

Witnesses headquarters refused an Associated Press request to interview an expert on blood beliefs. Instead, General Counsel Philip Brumley issued a prepared statement rejecting Louderback-Wood's "analysis and conclusions" in general.

"Any argument challenging the validity of this religious belief inappropriately trespasses into profoundly theological and doctrinal matters," Brumley stated.

The Watchtower's 1945 ban said "all worshippers of Jehovah who seek eternal life in his new world" must obey. Such edicts are regarded as divine law, since the Governing Body uniquely directs true believers. Violators risk ostracism by family and friends.

A subsequent Watchtower pronouncement forbade storage of a patient's own blood for later transfusion. In all, Associated Jehovah's Witnesses lists 20 shifts and refinements in blood-related rules over the years.

At the core of their blood beliefs, Witnesses cite Acts 15:29, where Jesus' apostles agreed that Gentile converts should "keep abstaining from things sacrificed to idols and from blood." The Witnesses also cite passages in Genesis and Leviticus.

Judaism and Christianity have always understood these scriptures to ban blood-eating for nourishment. This underlies Judaism's kosher procedures to extract blood from meat, which Witnesses do not follow. Christianity eventually decided the rule was temporary.

Experts assume that Raymond Franz's late uncle, Frederick Franz, who served anonymously as the Witnesses' chief theologian, decided those passages cover blood transfusions. But Raymond Franz raises questions about the blood policy in his book "In Search of Christian Freedom." Among them:

_Why forbid a patient's own stored blood yet permit components derived from large amounts of donated and stored blood?

_Why allow organ transplants, which introduce far more foreign white blood cells than transfusions?

_The Witnesses forbid plasma, which is mostly water, but allow the components in it that provide therapy. So what's the point of banning plasma?

Advances in bloodless surgery have reduced medical dangers for Witnesses in the United States, but Associated Jehovah's Witnesses maintains the blood policy is a life-threatening problem elsewhere.

Louderback-Wood says she'll be contented if her protest saves one child's life.


On the Net:

Witnesses' official brochure: http://www.watchtower.org/library/hb

Dissenters' data: http://www.ajwrb.org



© 2006 The Associated Press


For all the details


Together we will make a difference

Welcome to JWTruth.com Sign in | Join | Help




Welcome to JWTruth.com

JWTruth.com is not an official site of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society (the global corporate organization of the 'Jehovah's Witnesses' religion) and is not in any way affiliated with, run by or endorsed by them.

This is a campaigning web site. Its purpose is to provide authoritative information about, and to campaign to change, the abusive policies of the Watchtower Society. These have blighted the lives of thousands of people, and continue to harm even more every day they remain unchanged.

Our first major campaign concerns Watchtower's sometimes lethal blood policies. Other campaigns are in the pipeline. Click the link at the top of the page to register and receive free newsletters and notifications of future campaigns. Your details will never be disclosed to any third parties.

Send a protest email NOW to Watchtower Society: tell them what you think of their blood policy.

Blood transfusion exposé paves the way for massive Jehovah's Witness lawsuits

A new article in the Autumn issue of Baylor University's prestigious Journal of Church and State (opens in a new window), exposes the vulnerability of the Jehovah's Witnesses' religious organization to massive claims for damages because they misrepresented the medical risks of blood transfusions to bolster their religious tenets.


Send a protest email NOW to Watchtower Society: tell them what you think of their blood policy.

"Could Your Child Make a Mature Decision?"

The December 2005 Kingdom Ministry has an article "Could Your Child Make a Mature Decision?" It instructs parents to indoctrinate their kids to refuse blood and make themselves a martyr.


Send a protest email NOW to Watchtower Society: tell them what you think of their blood policy.



What's New - The Jensen letters - Links - Media response - Blood policy made simple - Medical contempt

Blood Campaign   Blood policy made simple   Child martyrs   Safeguarding your children?   Medical contempt   JWs and the Apostolic Decree   Watchtower's deceit   The Jensen letters   No universal assent   "Thousands of youths died"   Child sacrifice   How many die?   Watchtower misrepresentation   Sample media release   Send a protest email Media response Links Link to us

About us

Copyright © 2005 - 2006 JWTruth.comFor all the details: http://www.jwtruth.com/

free hit counter